Problem · For finance leaders
Don't just track overdue invoices. Find the problems that will make them overdue.
Where it starts
It starts with one person's morning.
Elena Park · accounts receivable
Wednesday, 11 AM. Halvorsen Coatings has three open invoices.
The aging report shows nothing overdue. An email to sales says Halvorsen is holding INV-20790 until it gets a corrected certificate. A new $91,500 batch for them is scheduled Oct 26.
Before she can act, Elena has to find out who owns the fix, and whether to produce the next order at all.
Illustrative example · sample company and data
The information exists. The operational picture doesn't.
Disputes and deductions found late.
Document holds, short-ship deductions, quantity disputes and pricing errors sit in someone else's inbox until the invoice is overdue.
Collections chasing the wrong person.
Reminders go to AP while the real fix sits with quality, logistics or sales.
Exposure grows unnoticed.
New orders are produced and shipped for customers who are already paying late.
Unreliable cash forecasts.
Payment promises and slowing payers live in emails and notes, not the forecast.
How one change spreads
From one message to a business result
One account, start to finish
A documentation hold, $186K in open invoices, and a new batch about to start
It catches the problem before the invoice goes overdue
Today's process
- Oct 7AP's email about the certificate lands with the sales rep
- Oct 10INV-20790 shows overdue on the aging report
- Oct 15Automated reminder sent. No reply
- Oct 18INV-20812 overdue too. $124K now past due
- Oct 26New batch produced for the same customer, $91.5K more exposure
- Oct 30Collector calls, learns about the certificate. Fix starts now
With LevelOneAI
- Oct 7Payment hold linked to INV-20790, lot 2417-B and the account's other open invoices
- Oct 7Work item opened: documentation hold, two days before the due date
- Oct 7Quality asked for the corrected certificate
- Oct 19New order linked to the account. Exposure added to the work item before production
It connects the payment hold to its cause and its consequences
"We need a corrected CoA for lot 2417-B before we can release INV-20790."
INV-20790 $48,200 due Oct 9 and INV-20812 $75,600 due Oct 17 ($124K). INV-20857 $62,400 due Oct 24.
Reminder sent for INV-20790. No reply.
Corrected certificate not yet issued.
$91,500 resin batch scheduled Mon Oct 26.
Days to pay rose from 29 to 42. Likely the document issue, not cash trouble.
The conclusion it reaches: this isn't a collections problem yet. It's a documentation problem owned by Quality. Until it's fixed, all three invoices ($186,400) are likely to be held, and the next order adds $91,500 more unless someone decides on a release condition before it's produced.
It drives the issue to a verified resolution
Who does what
- Sends the corrected certificate for lot 2417-BQuality Oct 8
- Follows up with Halvorsen AP once it's sentAccounts receivable Oct 8
- Decides the release condition for SO-4471Sales director Oct 23
- Confirms payment postedAccounts receivable On receipt
Closes only when
- Corrected certificate sent and acknowledged by AP
- Payment date confirmed in writing
- Payment posted in the ERP
- Release condition for the next order recorded
Found
2 days before due
instead of weeks later, after reminders go unanswered
Exposure caught
$91.5K
new batch held for a decision before it was produced
Sources connected
6
AP email, invoices, dunning log, quality records, sales order and payment history
Illustrative example · sample company and figures. A Workbench is measured against your own baseline.
The workbench for this
The Order-to-Cash Disputes Workbench
What it connects
- Customer AP and sales email
- Invoices, deductions and dunning
- Quality and shipping records
- Open sales orders
What closes an issue
- Certificate sent and acknowledged
- Payment date confirmed
- Payment posted
- Release condition recorded
Why not AR automation or a credit-risk tool? AR automation sends reminders on schedule, and credit tools predict who might pay late. Neither tells you why this customer is holding payment, which team can fix it, or what you're still shipping them.
See the Order-to-Cash Disputes demoWhat's at stake
Finance: protect cash flow.
What we measure
A supplier delay, a short shipment, a spec or customer change that reached production, shipping or billing too late.
Expedites and premium freight, overtime, line-down time, late or lost shipments, penalties.
Your yearly impact
$360,000
12 times a year × $30,000 each, lost to changes nobody acted on in time.
Payback
LevelOneAI pays back the $20,000 setup if it helps you catch 1 of those 12 in time.
Your numbers, your estimate. We measure the real result against your own baseline after go-live.
See pricing and the full calculatorStart with Workbench Starter
Try order-to-cash disputes on your own work. No setup.
Connect your email in Claude or ChatGPT and add the documents you have. These two make the results sharpest:
- Open invoices (AR aging)
- Open orders
30-day free trial, then $199/month. No card needed for the 30-day trial. Cancel anytime.
See it on your own work.